...
In 2018, President Donald Trump made a seismic decision that reshaped U.S. foreign policy and global nuclear dynamics: he withdrew the United States from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), commonly known as the Iran nuclear deal, negotiated under President Barack Obama. This move, described by Trump as correcting a “horrible one-sided deal,” unleashed a cascade of consequences that now threaten his second term as he navigates pressures from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to strike Iran’s nuclear sites. The fallout could destabilize the Middle East, erode global trust in U.S. commitments, and push nations toward nuclear proliferation or alignment with America’s adversaries. This analysis unpacks the JCPOA’s purpose, Trump’s rationale for dismantling it, and why this decision haunts his presidency in 2025.
The JCPOA: A Diplomatic Triumph to Curb Iran’s Nuclear Ambitions
Signed on July 14, 2015, after two years of grueling negotiations in Vienna, the JCPOA was a landmark agreement between Iran and the P5+1 (United States, United Kingdom, France, Russia, China, plus Germany). Championed by Obama and Secretary of State John Kerry, it aimed to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons. Iran agreed to reduce its uranium stockpile by 97% (from 10,000 kg to 300 kg), limit enrichment to 3.67% (suitable for civilian use but not weapons), dismantle two-thirds of its centrifuges, and allow unprecedented inspections by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). In exchange, Iran received relief from nuclear-related sanctions, including the release of $100 billion in frozen assets and resumed oil exports.
“It blocks every possible pathway Iran could use to build a nuclear bomb while ensuring—through a comprehensive, intrusive, and unprecedented verification and transparency regime—that Iran’s nuclear program remains exclusively peaceful,” Obama’s White House declared in 2015.
The deal extended Iran’s “breakout time”—the period needed to produce enough fissile material for a nuclear weapon—from a few months to over a year. The Council on Foreign Relations estimated it could delay Iran’s nuclear weapon capability for over a decade if adhered to. The IAEA verified Iran’s compliance by January 16, 2016, when the deal took effect, ensuring sites like Fordow and Natanz were under strict oversight.
Trump’s Withdrawal: A Calculated Gamble
On May 8, 2018, Trump announced the U.S. withdrawal from the JCPOA, calling it “the worst deal ever” and arguing it failed to address Iran’s ballistic missile program or its support for proxies like Hezbollah and Hamas. Advised by hawkish figures like Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and National Security Adviser John Bolton, Trump reimposed sanctions, launching a “maximum pressure” campaign to cripple Iran’s economy and force a new deal. He claimed the JCPOA’s “sunset clauses,” which phased out restrictions (e.g., centrifuge limits by 2025, uranium stockpile caps by 2030), gave Iran a path to nuclear weapons.
“The Iran Deal was one of the worst and most one-sided transactions the United States has ever entered into,” Trump stated, as archived by the White House in 2018.
Trump’s decision ignored IAEA reports confirming Iran’s compliance and alienated allies like France’s Emmanuel Macron and Germany’s Angela Merkel, who warned of a “Pandora’s box” leading to conflict. Former President Obama criticized the move, saying it left the U.S. with “a losing choice between a nuclear-armed Iran or another war in the Middle East” The New York Times. A Pew Research Center poll showed 53% of Americans and 94% of U.S. international relations scholars disapproved.
Consequences: Iran’s Nuclear Leap and Regional Instability
Trump’s withdrawal had immediate effects. In May 2019, Iran began breaching JCPOA limits, enriching uranium beyond 3.67% and expanding its stockpile. By 2025, Iran’s breakout time shrank to 3–4 months, with enrichment levels reaching 60%—a short step from the 90% needed for weapons-grade uranium, per the IAEA CNBC. The assassination of Iranian General Qassem Soleimani in January 2020, ordered by Trump, further escalated tensions, prompting Iran to abandon enrichment caps.
Israel, led by Netanyahu, and Saudi Arabia supported Trump’s move, but European allies, China, and Russia condemned it. The UN Security Council resolution endorsing the JCPOA remained binding, raising questions about U.S. compliance with international law. Iran’s nuclear advances, coupled with reduced IAEA oversight, have heightened fears of a regional arms race, with Israel maintaining its nuclear monopoly and Gulf states eyeing their own programs.
Irrationality of Trump’s Decision
Trump’s withdrawal was irrational given the JCPOA’s success in constraining Iran’s nuclear program. The deal provided time to negotiate a stronger follow-on agreement, as Obama and Biden intended. Experts like Richard Nephew, a former State Department official, argued that staying in the JCPOA would have preserved transparency and delayed Iran’s capabilities PolitiFact. Instead, Trump’s “maximum pressure” failed to force Iran to renegotiate, as Tehran accelerated its nuclear program in defiance. The policy also strained U.S. alliances, with Europe resisting sanctions on companies trading with Iran, like Boeing’s $17 billion deal, which was canceled.
Haunting Trump’s Second Term
In 2025, Trump’s second term faces the repercussions. Netanyahu, wary of a diplomatic deal, has pushed for U.S. strikes on Iran’s nuclear sites, including Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan. On June 21, 2025, U.S. forces joined Israel in bombing these facilities, using the GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator, escalating the conflict NPR. Trump claimed the sites were “completely obliterated,” but analysts like James Acton warn Iran could reconstitute its program within years if enriched uranium and centrifuges survive The New Yorker.
“I’m kind of appalled, as an American citizen, that the President would start military action without congressional authorization,” said James Acton, co-director of the Nuclear Policy Program at the Carnegie Endowment The New Yorker.
Iran has threatened retaliation, potentially targeting U.S. bases -infact, they are following through with it, which could spiral into a broader war. This risks alienating Trump’s base, who oppose Middle East conflicts, as noted by conservative pundit Tucker Carlson PBS News. Globally, trust in U.S. commitments has eroded, as nations like China and Russia criticize the U.S. for violating the JCPOA. This could spur countries like Saudi Arabia or South Korea to pursue nuclear weapons or align with adversaries like Russia, fearing U.S. unreliability.
Projections and Global Implications
The strikes may delay Iran’s nuclear program but not eliminate it, as underground facilities like Fordow are resilient. A prolonged conflict could destabilize the Middle East, disrupt oil markets, and strain U.S. resources. The Washington Post warns that Iran might activate weaponization efforts if pressed, a shift U.S. intelligence has not yet detected. Other nations may view the U.S. as a fickle partner, undermining treaties like the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). Trump’s envoy, Steve Witkoff, continues negotiations, but Iran demands sanctions relief, complicating diplomacy CNBC.
Conclusion
Trump’s decision to “nuke” the JCPOA in 2018, driven by domestic politics and a miscalculation of Iran’s response, has backfired, bringing Iran closer to nuclear capability and entangling the U.S. in a risky escalation. As Netanyahu pushes for more strikes, Trump’s presidency hangs in the balance, facing potential war and global distrust. The lesson is clear: dismantling diplomatic agreements without a viable alternative can ignite crises that haunt future administrations.
Add new comment